Funding search

Find who already funds work like yours.

Private foundations don’t post open calls, so nobody can search them. We read IRS filings instead — 9.6 million grants from 174,053 foundations and grantmaking charities, searchable by what the money was actually for.

1 funder with a record of paying for “microgravity”

Where the money went

1.0×
Center for the Advancement of → Palo Alto Research Center Parc: $275K across 2 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Revbio Inc: $252K across 3 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → University of Alabama at Birmingham: $248K across 2 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Baylor College of Medicine: $132K across 1 grant, latest 2022Center for the Advancement of → University of Pittsburgh: $130K across 2 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System: $122K across 2 grants, latest 2022Center for the Advancement of → Leidos Inc: $66K across 1 grant, latest 2022Center for the Advancement of → Stanford University: $56K across 2 grants, latest 2022Center for the Advancement of → The University of Alabama: $51K across 2 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Boston University: $50K across 1 grant, latest 2021Center for the Advancement of → Johns Hopkins University: $48K across 2 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Walter Reed Army Institute of Research: $23K across 3 grants, latest 2023Center for the Advancement of → Kernal Biologics Inc: $4K across 1 grant, latest 2021Center for the Advancement of: $1.5M on this topic. Open the funder.Center for the Advancement of$1.5MPalo Alto Research Center Parc: received $275K on this topicPalo Alto Research Center Parc$275KRevbio Inc: received $252K on this topicRevbio Inc$252KUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham: received $248K on this topicUniversity of Alabama at Birmin…$248KBaylor College of Medicine: received $132K on this topicBaylor College of Medicine$132KUniversity of Pittsburgh: received $130K on this topicUniversity of Pittsburgh$130KBoard of Regents of University of Wisconsin System: received $122K on this topicBoard of Regents of University…$122KLeidos Inc: received $66K on this topicLeidos Inc$66KStanford University: received $56K on this topicStanford University$56KThe University of Alabama: received $51K on this topicThe University of Alabama$51KBoston University: received $50K on this topicBoston University$50KJohns Hopkins University: received $48K on this topicJohns Hopkins University$48KWalter Reed Army Institute of Research: received $23K on this topicWalter Reed Army Institute of R…$23KKernal Biologics Inc: received $4K on this topicKernal Biologics Inc$4K
1 funders, 13 recipients, grants matching “microgravity” only. Ribbon width is proportional to the total given; each funder has its own colour. Hover a name to isolate its flows, click a funder to open it. Drag to move around; zoom with the buttons, a double-click, or the wheel after clicking the map.

This is one keyword. PaperOrbit reads your actual paper and searches on everything in it — population, methods, outcomes — then explains why each funder fits.

Start with one paper

Search by location

Local foundations often favor nearby communities. Enter a ZIP code to see foundations based near you, and where grant money has actually landed in your area.

Source: IRS Form 990-PF Part XV and Form 990 Schedule I, tax years 20192025. These are grants already paid, a record of what an organization funds rather than an open call. Private foundations rarely accept unsolicited applications and the route in is usually a program officer; grantmaking charities and associations more often run real application cycles, so check their website. How this data is built, and its limits →